Sometimes even when you tie, you lose. I suffered that particular sports wagering axiom last weekend as I correctly picked three games, missed on three games and ended up down $25 because of the vig. Something about that just does not feel right, but like my sports junkie cousin told me many years ago, “bookies are bookies because they make money. If they lost money they would not be bookies.” So my imaginary bookie took me for an imaginary 25 bucks. And I only have three games on the board this week to get my payback.
For those that are unfamiliar with this particular weekly column, I started midway through the MAC season with a fictional $1,000 to bet on MAC football games. And, week after week, I make my selections and put some of this fictional money down on the games. Prior to last week I was down to $820, but my $25 loss last week dropped the kitty down to $795. Here are my selections for this week:
Akron (+13.5) at Ball State – The Zips are having huge problems getting first-year head coach Rob Ianello’s system down and were blown out last week at Temple. With a rough schedule the rest of the way this is probably Akron’s last legitimate chance to get a win. Ball State is not a bad football team, but the Cardinals have been very inconsistent this season. Akron will remain winless, but they will probably win with the spread.



Saturday afternoon Western Michigan and Northern Illinois played in a classic football game that had huge conference championship implications. The game, televised locally on a network channel, was as big as it gets as far as Mid-American Conference football is concerned. Northern Illinois, riding a five-game winning streak traveled to Western Michigan to take on the Broncos in Waldo Stadium. Western needed a win to stay in the MAC West championship hunt.
Looking over this weekend’s slate of Mid-American Conference football games there really are not one or two games that stand out to me from a wagering perspective. In fact, if I were to set my own lines for these games everything would probably look relatively the same. When I was in school that was how I would choose what games I would wager on…after looking through the schedule I would put down numbers I thought were reasonable on each game. Then compare my numbers to the actual betting lines. If there was a big discrepancy on any of the games, that was where my wager would usually go.
