I couldn’t come up with an adequate story this week, so I decided to take the time to tackle the most pressing questions, issues, concerns, comments, beliefs—basically everything—Clevelant sports. To do this, I decided to throw together an all-inclusive, Cleveland mailbag; the first of its kind. Mailbags are hot, everyone's doing 'em. Unfortunately, my mailbox was completely void of any and all fan mail, so I had to improvise. It’s a gimmick that is both cheap and sad and screams desperation. But it’s a gimmick that I feel has some legs. To my knowledge, I don’t know if it has ever been done. Ever. So let’s do this.
I don’t know, it’s close. Here's something I never thought I'd hear a Browns fan say: “Giving up next year's second round pick was worth it.” For years and years this franchise has been defined by its epic run of failures in the draft. But over the last three years the Browns have drafted better than any team in the league, which is werid because they've made more seemingly "questionable" picks than any team in the league, too. Joe Haden, T.J. Ward, trading down with Atlanta, trading back up for Phil Taylor, Greg Little, a fuc*ing running back with the third overall pick, John Hughes, Mitchell Schwartz, the now infamous 28 year old quarterback, it's a rather large list. Tom Heckert has elicited more draft-day fury from this fan base than all of the previous regimes combined. Yet, it’s December, the team is 4-8, and for some reason I'm not violently sprinting in the direction of the “Mike Lomardi” bandwagon. And naturally, for some reason, Joe Banner will likely give Heckert the boot.
Sidenote: did you know the Browns have a chance the become the first team in NFL history to feature a rookie 1,000 yard receiver, a rookie 1,000 yard rusher, and a rookie 3,000 yard passer? Go ahead and interpret that information however you’d like.
Phil Taylor. You always hear, "you can’t teach height." But you also can’t teach weight. Taylor has a lot of it. He’s a round mound, 300-pound (fill-in cool rhyming noun of choice), and already one of the top three run stoppers in the league. He was dearly missed in the first half of the season. It's disconcerting to think what could have been, had Taylor and Haden been on the field all year.
Joe Thomas. I don’t know if anyone was aware of this, but the Browns are 32-60 when Joe Thomas starts at left tackle, which has been every game since 2007.
Ok, ok, that was just mean. I’m sorry, Joe. I didn't mean it, Joe. I love you, Joe.
I can't say, only because I thought they were on the right track about 14 previous other times and I was wrong. But I've got to say that these last couple of weeks, I’ve actually been mildly frightened by the optimism of this teams roster; so much so that I’m prepared to say the following: The Cleveland Browns...(hold on, I need to make sure my fingers are capable of typing this. Ok, they are)... The Cleveland Browns have the look of a legitimate football team. Even if you can’t help staring at the Browns sideline just to remind yourself, “Oh yea, this team has one of the worst coaches in football,” it would appear this team is starting to form an identity, and for once it's on the defensive side of the ball. I'm looking forward to watching them this Sunday. I wouldn't normally say that this time of year. There offense really isn't too shabby either.
And on that note, I'm prepared to say something absolutely absurd. Injuries aside, I think this is the best Browns team since 1994. Yes, better than the 2002 team and even better than 2007.
In full disclosure, the 2002 Cleveland Browns 'should' go down as the miracle in Cleveland the same way the '76 Cavs team is remembered for "The Miracle at Richfield." You won't see another 9-7 season like that again in your lifetime. I'm confident in saying that.
The 2007 team, they were blessed to be ingratiated with one of the weakest schedules in the history of the current schedule format (2002-present), only defeating one team that finished the season with a winning record (Seattle).
Meanwhile this current Browns team we're watching has flat-out been the recipients of poor luck.
I’m afraid to even respond to that. But here’s my overall assessment of the Browns: They’ve likely been the unluckiest team in the NFL this year, and I think that's what Noah was trying to get at when he posed this above-listed statement.
Now having said that, here’s my overall assessment of the NFL: Eighty percent of the teams are on the same mediocre level, and the rest are either elite or downright terrible. If you’re in the “mediocre” group, which the Browns are, the success (or failure) of your season comes down to 1) the number of elite teams that are on your schedule, 2) the number of terrible teams that are on your schedule, 3) the number of catastrophic injuries you avoid, 4) the number of catastrophic injuries your opponents incur, and 5) the frequency with which your opponents decide to gift-wrap you wins by mismanaging games down the stretch.
Boys and girls, the National Football League. (see: the previous two Super Bowl Champions)
On the Browns opening drive the Steelers returned a Brandon Weeden interception for a touchdown. So the Browns spotted the Steelers, the league's no. 1 ranked defense, seven points before Charlie Batch even set foot on the field.
Cleveland's odds of winning the game at this point were less than 16%
I choose to move to the Cavs.
I’m sure if I spent an hour scraping through data sets on basketball-reference.com I could find a couple names to throw out there for you. Then again, maybe I wouldn’t. If collecting excessive rebounds were synonymous with the use of PED’s, and the Cavs weren’t a 4-15 team, you can bet this would be a bigger story. What he is doing right now is unprecedented. Never in my wildest dreams did I think he would develop a consistent, mid range jumper. This is the same guy we nearly lynched after game 3 of the NBA Finals. He was the last guy anyone would want shooting a jumper. Now, get ready because I’m about to compare him to a dihybrid cross between Kevin Garnett and Dennis Rodman. He’s a dihybrid cross between Kevin Garnett and Dennis Rodman.
I ... I don’t know.
There’s a ton of flawed logic going around about Anderson Varejao and the decision to trade him. The age argument is the most flawed of all. Yea, Andy is 30 going on 31, but is that old? Is this the NFL. Is Andy's "reckless" style of play really a concern in the grand scheme of injury? Let me throw out the names of a few guys who were 30 years old about a decade ago: Kobe Bryant, Tim Duncan, Kevin Garnett, Steve Nash, Dirk Nowitzki, Ray Allen, Paul Pierce, Jason Kidd.
I like it. But yea, the Timberwolves aren’t trading Kevin Love.
Interesting.
Yea, that was as rowdy as I’ve ever seen Fred McLeod get. I’ve thought about this and eventually determined that Austin Carr is hurting Fred’s chances to become a member of Cleveland’s Mount Rushmore of sports announcers. We love Austin, his likability is off the charts, and his patented one liners never get old (I think???), but he’s been stealing Fred’s thunder for years and I’m not sure how I feel about it.